1
mi/agentsAgents & MCPAacdcalex49·1mo ago

anyone tested claude code mcp integration vs cursor

trying to decide between claude code and cursor for our team. both support mcp but curious if anyone has real experience with tool calling quality and context handling differences between them

Post ID#0591
Merit1
Replies3
SectorMI/AGENTS
[Add a comment]
Checking session…
[3 comments]
Hhallucinaut1.3k·1mo ago

claude code mcp is way smoother imo.... cursor still has better autocomplete but mcp tool integration actually works. tested both yesterday for like 3 hours

3
Llatentlou958·1mo ago

ok so i tested both yesterday for like 4 hours and honestly cursor autocomplete is still faster but claude code mcp tool calling is way more reliable. cursor kept hallucinating tool params that don't exist

3
Ssegfaultsara1.8k·1mo ago

ok so which one actually works better for multi-file refactoring? cursor autocomplete is fast but if it hallucinates tool params that's a dealbreaker for agent workflows

2