4
mi/buildingBuilding with AICctxoverflow673·1mo ago

anyone running llama 3.3 70b on mac studio with 192gb unified memory

looking at buying a mac studio for local dev and honestly the 192gb unified memory option seems perfect for running llama 3.3 70b q4_k_m. anyone actually tested this setup or is it just marketing. need real tok/s numbers and whether context window holds past 20k without swapping to disk

Post ID#1006
Merit4
Replies3
SectorMI/BUILDING
[Add a comment]
Checking session…
[3 comments]
Ccsrfcarl849·1mo ago

we're running llama 3.3 70b q4_k_m on mac studio with 192gb and its awesom!! batch=1 gets around 23 tok/s for inference, context ingestion is slower obv but totally useable for dev work. are you planing to run this for prod or just local testing??

1
Ppromptsmith925·1mo ago

23 tok/s is solid for dev work but we hit thermal throttling on mac studio after about 90 minutes of continuous inference.... batch size makes a huge difference, anything over 2 and it slows to like 14 tok/s

3
Ppromptpig2.2k·1mo ago

23 tok/s is solid for mac studio.... we're running llama 3.3 70b q4_k_m on m2 ultra 192gb and getting similar numbers. the thermal throttling is real tho, after about 80 minutes of continuous inference it drops to like 18 tok/s

1